![](http://scienceupfirst.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/02/Climate_Delay_1EN-1.jpg)
![](http://scienceupfirst.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/02/Climate_Delay_2EN.jpg)
![](http://scienceupfirst.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/02/Climate_Delay_3EN.jpg)
![](http://scienceupfirst.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/02/Climate_Delay_4EN.jpg)
![](http://scienceupfirst.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/02/Climate_Delay_5EN.jpg)
![](http://scienceupfirst.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/02/Climate_Delay_6EN.jpg)
![](http://scienceupfirst.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/02/Climate_Delay_7EN.jpg)
![](http://scienceupfirst.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2024/02/Climate_Delay_8EN.jpg)
Climate delay is all about discouraging climate action. This includes:
- Suggesting that others need to act first before we do
- Claiming that disruptive changes are not necessary to achieve our goal.
- Focusing on imperfections in the proposed solutions and using them to argue against implementation.
- Leading you to believe that it’s simply not possible to mitigate climate change.
- Misleading you into believing some actions have a greater climate impact than they actually do.
While some of these arguments hold some truth and are important to discuss in certain contexts, solutions don’t have to be perfect or “all-or-nothing” to be implemented. Suggesting otherwise is only delaying urgent and much needed climate actions.
Share this with your circle, so they too can learn to recognize these delayist tactics!
Share our original Tweet!
Whataboutism, the ‘free rider’ excuse, policy perfectionism, appeal to well-being, fossil fuel solutionism… What does that all mean?
They’re types of arguments used to delay important climate actions. Learn to recognize them here https://t.co/pWzx0dsoT6#ScienceUpFirst pic.twitter.com/NadMtoIVFb
— ScienceUpFirst | LaScienced’Abord (@ScienceUpFirst) December 6, 2023
View our original Instagram Post!
View this post on Instagram
- Climate Misinformation in the Media
- Fossil fuel companies’ climate communication strategies: Industry messaging on renewables and natural gas
- The American electric utility industry’s role in promoting climate denial, doubt, and delay
- Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil’s climate change communications
- Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
- Early warnings and emerging accountability: Total’s responses to global warming, 1971–2021 |
- From denial to delay: Climate change discourses in Ireland
- Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature
- Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming
- Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming
- Expert credibility in climate change
- Discourses of climate delay
- The Machinery of Delay Now Masking as Climate Change Denial
- Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the World?
- Delay as the New Denial: The Latest Republican Tactic to Block Climate Action
- Are technology myths stalling aviation climate policy?
- This Ain’t Your Daddy’s Greenwashing: An Assessment of the American Petroleum Institute’s Power Past Impossible Campaign
- Petrochemical transition narratives: Selling fossil fuel solutions in a decarbonizing world
- The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: A mismatch between discourse, actions and investments
- The ‘climatism’ cartel: why climate change deniers oppose market-based mitigation policy
- Climate delay discourses present in global mainstream television coverage of the IPCC’s 2021 report
- Deny, Deceive, Delay
- Is it too late (to stop dangerous climate change)?
- Greenwashing – the deceptive tactics behind environmental claims | FR : Verdissement d’image – les tactiques trompeuses qui se cachent derrière les affirmations environnementales
- Environmental claims and greenwashing | FR : Déclarations environnementales et écoblanchiment
- Don’t be bamboozled: the real deal with “bamboo fabric” | FR : Pas si zen : la vérité sur les tissus de bambou
- Global sweep finds 40% of firms’ green claims could be misleading
- Volkswagen and Audi to pay up to $2.1 billion to consumers and $15 million penalty for environmental marketing claims | FR : Volkswagen et Audi paieront jusqu’à 2,1 milliards de dollars aux consommateurs et 15 millions de dollars en sanction pour leurs représentations environnementales
- Plant or plastic? How to decode vegan leather alternatives
- Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media
- Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
- Evidence-based strategies to combat scientific misinformation
- Misinformer Tactic: Ad Hominem Attack | FR : Tactique de désinformation : Attaque ad hominem
- Misinformer Tactic: Red Herring | FR : Tactique de désinformation: La diversion
- Misinformer Tactic: Doubt Mongering | FR : Tactique de désinformation : Semer le doute
- Misinformer Tactic: Slippery Slope | FR : Tactique de désinformation : la pente glissante
- Misinformer Tactic: False Dichotomy | FR : Tactique de désinformation: la fausse dichotomie
- Misinformer Tactic: Firehose of Falsehood | FR : Tactique de désinformation : Le trop-plein d’informations