Skip to main content

Skeptic vs Cynic

Share:

When you see a claim online, how do you process it? Do you believe everything you see? Or nothing? 🤔

Many people nowadays are cynical, meaning that they assume the worst of other people (1-4). Globally, trust in media, institutions, and fellow citizens is quite low (4-6). In Canada, only 33% believe that ‘most people can be trusted’ (7)! People who are cynical are more likely to dismiss information from media and institutions without evaluating the claim, because they assume the author is untrustworthy (2,8,9). This can actually make cynical people MORE likely to believe misinformation and conspiracy theories, which often criticize experts and people in power without evidence, appealing to a cynical perspective (10). 

Of course, you can’t just believe everything you see online! Naïve trust means falling for scams, believing harmful misinformation, and being unable to determine which conflicting information is true (8,9).

The happy medium is to be skeptical. Skeptics question the claims they see and investigate them (1,2,4,8-11). They will not believe without proof, and can question their own assumptions, but will accept a fact or change their mind when provided with solid evidence (1,3). This level of questioning is healthy for democracy, can improve trust in media and confidence in other institutions, and can help skeptics be better informed and less likely to fall for false information and scams (3,8,9,11,12).

Explore our other posts for tips on fact checking, spotting misinformation, and developing your science and media literacy. 🔍

Feeling skeptical? Check out our sources! 

Share our original Bluesky Post!