A health misinformation audit of five popular AI chatbots found that approximately 50% of all responses were either “somewhat” or “highly problematic.” The audit evaluated how AI chatbots responded to health misinformation across five health topics: vaccines, cancer, stem cells, nutrition, and athletic performance. The audit also found that the chatbots returned accurate, error-free scientific references in only 40% of cases.
Category: Misinformation 101
-
3 myths from the Manosphere








Heard of the “manosphere”? It’s often used to refer to a collection of online communities and influencers who claim to promote men’s health and well being. It unfortunately rarely stops there.
Manosphere influencers will often rely on narrow and exaggerated definitions of masculinity. They will use anecdotes and negative experiences to degrade women. To them, the world must be seen through rigid “men”/”women” differences.
What’s more, they spread harmful myths and create content meant to elicit a reaction out of you, whether you agree with them or not.
Don’t be swayed by these manipulation tactics and read how these myths fall apart under scrutiny.
As always, do not feed the trolls!
Sources- The End of Hypergamy: Global Trends and Implications | Population and Development Review | November 2016
- The Reversal of the Gender Gap in Education and Its Consequences for Family Life | Annual Review of Sociology | May 2018
- Eight Decades of Educational Assortative Mating: A Research Note | Demography | October 2024
- Modern women marrying men of the same or lower social class | IPPR | April 5, 2012
- Assortative mating and couple similarity: Patterns, mechanisms, and consequences | Social and Personality Psychology Compass | August 3, 2017
- Genetic and educational assortative mating among US adults | PNAS | June 3, 2014
- Trends in Education Assortative Marriage From 1940 to 2003 | California Center for Population Research | February 2005
- Romantic relationships are more important for men than for women | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | December 26, 2024
- Gender Differences in the Associations between Relationship Status, Social Support, and Wellbeing | Journal of Family Psychology | 2019
- UN Women sounds the alarm over online misogyny | United Nations | June 24, 2025
- How Online Spaces Are Fueling Misogyny – And What We Can Do About It | Welsh Women’s Aid | May 9, 2025
- Online misogyny: the “manosphere” | CMHR | September 12, 2023
- Is the Alpha Wolf Idea a Myth? | Scientific American | February 28, 2023
- Wolf News and Information | Dave Mech | Retrieved May 7, 2026
- 50 Years in Print, L. David Mech’s The Wolf Remains Relevant | International Wolf Center | Summer 2020
- Le mâle alpha des masculinistes, un mythe? Vrai | Détecteur de rumeurs | December 14, 2023
- Frans de Waal: The surprising science of alpha males | TED Talk | November 2017
- The Emergence of Sex Differences in Personality Traits in Early Adolescence: A Cross-Sectional, Cross-Cultural Study | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | January 2015
- The Distance Between Mars and Venus: Measuring Global Sex Differences in Personality | PLoS ONE | January 4, 2012
- Gender differences in implicit and explicit personality traits | Personality and Individual Differences | November 2013
- Gender and emotions | Personality and Individual Differences | February 2003
- Gender Differences in Emotion Expression in Children: A Meta- Analytic Review | Psychological Bulletin | July 2013
- Gender Differences in Emotional Response: Inconsistency between Experience and Expressivity | PLOS One | June 30, 2016
- Gender and Emotion Expression: A Developmental Contextual Perspective | Emotion Review | January 2015
- Sex Differences in Emotion: Expression, Experience, and Physiology | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 1988
- Little evidence for sex or ovarian hormone influences on affective variability | Scientific Reports | October 22, 2021
- Sex Differences in Emotion | The Counseling Psychologist | 2002
- Gender differences in self-conscious emotional experience: A meta-analysis | Psychological Bulletin | September 2012
Share our original Bluesky Post!
View our original Instagram Post!
-
The Straw Man Fallacy






A strawman argument happens when someone twists what you said into something easier to attack. So instead of responding to the real point, they respond to a distorted version of it (1,2).
Example:
- Person A: “We should reduce plastic waste.”
- Person B: “So you think we should ban all plastic and make life impossible?”
This tactic can take different forms, like exaggerating a point, oversimplifying it, or taking it out of context. It works because the new version is simpler, more extreme, and easier to reject. It can also make the original idea seem unreasonable, which can turn people against it and rally support for the person attacking it (1).
This is different from simply misunderstanding someone. We can all misinterpret things sometimes, especially in fast conversations. If you’re not sure you understood, it’s better to ask questions or ask the person to clarify their point before assuming (3).
If someone is using a strawman argument against you, here’s what you can say or do:
Clearly state “That’s not what I said” and restate your point clearly. Then ask them to respond to your actual argument (3,4).Spot the distortion, and bring the conversation back to what was actually said.
Sources- Full article: The persuasiveness of the straw man rhetorical technique | Social Influence – Taylor & Francis Online | September 2008
- Strawman Fallacy | Logically Fallacious
- Straw Man Fallacy | Excelsior Online Writing Lab
- Strawman Arguments: What They Are and How to Counter Them | Effectiviology
Share our original Bluesky Post!
View our original Instagram Post!
-
Misinformer Tactic: Moving the Goalposts

Ever seen a conversation like this?
Person A: “Prove to me the moon landing isn’t fake.”
Person B: “Here are photos from the mission.”
Person A: “Those are photoshopped.”
Person B: “Okay, here’s video footage.”
Person A: “It was filmed in a studio.”
Person B: “We brought back rocks from the moon.”
Person A: “Those could be fake.”
Person B: “You can observe the landing sites from Earth.”
Person A: “I still don’t believe it.”And it keeps going… No matter what proof you bring, it’s never enough.
This is called moving the goalposts (1).
It happens when someone keeps changing what “counts” as proof. No matter how strong the evidence is, they ask for something new instead of engaging with what’s already there (2,3,4).
In real discussions, this can look like (3,5):
- Dismissing evidence without explaining why
- Asking for more and more proof
- Ignoring what was already shared
If you notice this happening, you can gently point it out: “Hey, it seems like the goal keeps changing. What kind of evidence would actually convince you?” (4).
That said, not every conversation will go somewhere. If someone isn’t open to changing their view, it’s okay to step away and save your energy (6,7).
Sources- Move the Goalposts | Cambridge Dictionary
- Moving the Goalposts | Logically Fallacious
- Understanding conspiracy theory tactics: moving the goalposts | The Skeptic | December 2021
- Moving the Goalposts | Bad Arguments – Wiley Online Library | May 2018
- The Fallacy of ‘Moving the Goalposts’, Explained | Snopes.com | February 2023
- Tips on countering conspiracy theories and misinformation | SciBeh | 2020
- How to talk to conspiracy theorists—and still be kind | MIT Technology Review | July 2020
Share our original Bluesky Post!
View our original Instagram Post!
-
Reranking partisan animosity in algorithmic social media feeds alters affective polarization
Experimental research using novel large language model-based methods demonstrates how, when it comes to the feed-ranking algorithms of social media platforms, reranking the visibility of hostile political content can reduce political polarization.
-
Appeal to Authority Bias

Have you ever seen someone in a lab coat online making bold health claims?🧑⚕️
Whether that person is a doctor or not, the coat makes them appear like an authority on the subject. That’s a classic example of the appeal to authority fallacy (a.k.a. an error in reasoning (1)).
It happens when we accept a claim as true just because an “authority” says so, instead of looking at the actual evidence. That authority could be a celebrity, a “doctor,” or someone who simply looks credible (2,3).
The problem?
Not all authorities are experts. And not all experts speak within their domain of expertise. Someone can be an epidemiologist studying diseases in seal colonies, but that doesn’t make them an expert on COVID-19 in humans. And even real experts can be wrong. What makes a claim reliable isn’t just who says it, but the evidence behind it (4,5,6).This tactic works because we naturally trust people who seem knowledgeable or familiar. On social media, that might mean wearing a lab coat, using technical language, or saying “studies show…” without proof.
And it doesn’t just affect people. One recent study found that AI systems were more likely to accept false health info when it was written like a doctor’s note (7).
That doesn’t mean we should ignore experts. In fact, relying on qualified experts is often helpful (2,4).
But here’s the key (4):
- Is this person actually an expert in this topic?
- Are they showing evidence, or just asking you to trust them?
If you catch this happening, ask: what evidence supports this claim, beyond who said it (8)?
Remember, “they said so” isn’t proof. It’s just a claim (2).
Sources- Fallacies | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Appeal to Authority Fallacy | Definition & Examples | Scribbr | June 2023
- Appeals to Authority | Open Library – Studies in Critical Thinking
- Logical Fallacies: Appeal to Authority | ThoughtCo. | March 2021
- Appeal to Authority | Logically Fallacious
- Your logical fallacy is appeal to authority | Your Logical Fallacy Is
- Mapping the susceptibility of large language models to medical misinformation across clinical notes and social media: a cross-sectional benchmarking analysis | The Lancet Digital Health | January 2026
- Appeal to Authority Fallacy: How to Avoid It | Think, But How? | July 2021
Share our original Bluesky Post!
View our original Instagram Post!
-
Social media use and well-being across adolescent development
Cohort study of one hundred thousand Australian adolescents finds that a moderate amount of social media use correlates with higher level of well-being compared with no and very high use levels. Findings, however, are based on self-reported data, making the study observational and lacking in sufficient rigour to draw strong conclusions.
-
The Quality of Evidence of and Engagement with Video Medical Claims
Analysis on health-related YouTube videos created by health practitioners shows that most medical claims were supported by “very low or no evidence,” and only 20% were supported by “high-quality” evidence. This research shows the ongoing need for online healthcare professionals to substantiate all claims with strong and accurate evidence and for audiences to maintain a critical approach when engaging social media content.
-
5 times our team thought an AI video was real
Think you can always spot an AI image? Think again. It is getting harder.
Older clues like weird hands or uneven eyes are becoming less common with newer AI tools. That means we cannot rely on visuals alone.
Here are a few smarter ways to check:
Look for the original source 🔎
Who posted the image first? Are they a trustworthy source?Check other sources 📰
Are other outlets reporting the same story or showing the same image? If a major event really happened, multiple sources should be talking about it.Pause if it triggers strong emotions 😡
Posts that make you feel shocked, angry, or excited are more likely to spread misinformation.Use fact-checking tools 🧰
Sites like Snopes, FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, and Reuters Fact Check can help verify viral claims. You can also always ask us or use MediaSmarts custom search engine that scans several of the most popular fact checker websites we just mentioned and more!You can still treat suspicious visuals as red flags (one extra finger is still a good cue the video is AI generated), but are not reliable proof anymore. AI images do not always look odd, and real photos can look unusual.
We all like to think we are good at spotting misinformation online. In reality, it can be tricky. The good news is, you do not need to be an expert to question what you see online. A quick pause and a few checks can go a long way.
Today, (March 27, 2026) is Canada’s first #AILiteracyDay hosted by our friends @mediasmarts.ca ! We pulled all these tips from their terrific resources. Visit their website to learn more.
Share our original Bluesky Post!
View our original Instagram Post!
-
About 4 in 10 teens support cellphone bans in classrooms; fewer back all-day restrictions
PEW survey research finds about 40% of American teens support banning cellphone use in classrooms but nearly 75% oppose banning them for the entire day.
-
Health misinformation can have immediate consequences





When unsupported health claims spread, they can quickly have real impacts on people’s health.
A recent example involving Tylenol and autism shows how fast that can happen.
Swipe to learn what the evidence actually says. 👉
This post was made in collaboration with @pwhrcanada and @grossesseensante
Sources- Changes in paracetamol and leucovorin use after a White House briefing | The Lancet | March 2026
- Tylenol orders in pregnant people plummeted after Trump falsely linked the medicine to autism | Scientific American | March 2026
- Does Tylenol Use during Pregnancy Cause Autism? What the Research Shows | Scientific American | September 2025
- Have a fever while pregnant? Here’s what to know and how to treat it | BabyCenter | January 2026
- Upcoming HHS report will link autism to common pain reliever, folate deficiency in pregnancy, Wall Street Journal reports | CNN | September 2025
- Tylenol has entered the chat: RFK Jr. wants to link it to autism, even though the best evidence says otherwise. | Inside Medicine | September 2025
- Evaluation of the evidence on acetaminophen use and neurodevelopmental disorders using the Navigation Guide methodology | Environmental Health | Springer Nature Link | September 2021
- Acetaminophen Use During Pregnancy and Children’s Risk of Autism, ADHD, and Intellectual Disability | JAMA | April 2024
- FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA has reviewed possible risks of pain medicine use during pregnancy | U.S. Food & Drug Administration | 2016
- Prenatal acetaminophen use and outcomes in children | American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology | March 2017
Share our original Bluesky Post!
View our original Instagram Post!
-
No, vaccines don’t cause autism

While there is absolutely no evidence that vaccines cause autism, it remains one of the most persistent myths surrounding vaccines to date.
But where did this myth begin? Who started it? Finally, why is the claim that vaccines cause autism completely unfounded?
Answers to those questions on this factsheet
The clinical definition of autism is “a lifelong neurodevelopmental condition that affects the way a person communicates and relates to people and the world around them”. All autistic lives are equal in worth to any other life. Autism is not a disease or an illness to be treated or cured. All autistic lives matter.
This resource was made in collaboration with @Immunize.ca and @camhnews.
Share our original Bluesky Post!
View our original Instagram Post!
-
Shared reading interventions to promote psychosocial well-being in older adults: a systematic review
Book clubs and reading groups for the win! Based on a systematic review focused on older adults, cognitively stimulating reading has numerous social and personal benefits while shared reading can foster positive social relationships and social engagement, leading to improved psychological health and well-being.
-
Heated Rivalry: Misinformers
When mom says we have Ilya Rozanov at home… ⬆️
While our rivalry with misinformers may be heated (not that way! Come on…), all our love is for our fellow science communicators who are hard at work (not that way!!) keeping people across Canada informed, educated, and entertained.
There are too many incredible science communicators for us to tag everyone… but we don’t ever want that problem to ever go away 😉
See below for some of the communicators we love. There are many many others but we can’t tag them all!
Share our original Bluesky Post!
View our original Instagram Post!
-
Omission Bias

Have you heard of “The Trolley Problem”?
Five people are tied to a train track. A train is coming. You can pull a lever to divert it to another track, but there is one person tied there too.
What do you do?
Option A: Do nothing. Five people die.
Option B: Pull the lever. One person dies, but five are saved.If Option A feels “safer” to you, you might be experiencing Omission Bias.
Omission bias is our tendency to see harmful actions as worse than harmful inaction, even when the outcome is similar, or even worse. In other words, causing harm can feel more morally wrong, more blameworthy, than allowing harm to happen (1,2,3).
In the trolley problem, pulling the lever means someone dies because of something you did. Not pulling it means more people die, but it can feel less direct and less like your fault (1).
This bias is a mental shortcut. When a decision feels heavy or uncertain, it can feel easier to leave things as they are than to weigh risks and benefits (1,3).
We see this often with vaccines. For a hesitant parent, vaccinating can feel like pulling the lever. It is an active choice (1). Vaccines are incredibly safe, and most side effects are mild and short lived. Serious reactions are rare (4). But if something were to happen, it can feel like it happened because of a decision they made. Choosing not to vaccinate can feel safer because it avoids action, but it does not remove the risk (1,5). In fact, the risk of severe illness, complications, or death from vaccine-preventable diseases is significantly higher than the risk of serious vaccine side effects (6).
We are all vulnerable to biases that shape how we see risk and responsibility. Being aware of them can help us make more informed decisions, and also better understand where others are coming from.
Sources- Omission Bias | The Decision Lab
- Action and Inaction in Moral Judgments and Decisions: Meta-Analysis of Omission Bias Omission-Commission Asymmetries | Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin | October 2022
- Omitting Omission Bias in the ICU | CHEST Critical Care | January 2026
- Vaccine safety and possible side effects | Government of Canada
- Omission bias and pertussis vaccination | Medical Decision Making | 1994
- Myth Busters – A Series of Essays Giving the Research Evidence Behind Canadian Healthcare Debates | Immunize Canada | December 2026
Share our original Bluesky Post!
View our original Instagram Post!