Skip to main content

Category: Misinformation 101

  • AI has a search citation problem

    Analysis on different AI search engines (Chatbots) finds an inability for the AI programs to decline answering questions when they are unsure of accuracy, thus creating false or ambiguous content in response to prompts. Links and citations found in the AI’s answers often contain false, inaccurate, or faulty links and citations. 

  • You don’t always have to debunk a false claim to make a difference.

    When someone believes something that’s inaccurate, our first instinct is often to correct it with facts. But that doesn’t always work like we hope it would. 

    Most people don’t like to be contradicted – especially if they care deeply about the topic. Plus, it’s not always easy to find the right words in the moment. You might know something sounds off, but might not have the right facts or numbers to explain why. Even experts sometimes need time to fact-check and respond clearly (1,2,3).

    That’s where bypassing can come in handy.

    Instead of arguing about what’s false, bypassing shifts the focus from the false information toward a new, more positive alternative (1,2,4).

    For example, instead of saying, “No, vaccines don’t cause X,” you might say: “Vaccines have saved millions of lives and reduced childhood mortality worldwide.” (5). 

    By bypassing misinformation, you avoid confrontation and shift the conversation toward something about the same topic that is both accurate and positive (2,3,4). 

    But, keep in mind that, bypassing doesn’t aim to correct specific misconceptions or deeply held beliefs. And in some cases – like public health emergencies – a direct correction might still be your best tool. So before jumping in, ask yourself: What’s my goal here? Is it to prove that “vaccines don’t cause harm”? Or to reinforce that “vaccines save lives”? While the first might call for a correction, the second might benefit from bypassing (2,4). 

    Bypassing (1,4): 
    • Avoids making people feel attacked. 
    • Redirects the conversation toward shared values or outcomes. 
    • Makes space for more than one idea to co-exist – you can hold concerns, while also recognizing the benefits of something. 

    By bypassing misinformation you are not erasing a false belief, but you are helping build up an alternative one, and that shift in focus can make a big difference (1,2,4).

    Share our original Bluesky Post!

    Instead of arguing about what's false, bypassing shifts the focus from the misinformation to a new, more positive alternative. Here are some examples and why bypassing can be useful 👉 scienceupfirst.com/misinformati… #ScienceUpFirst

    [image or embed]

    — ScienceUpFirst (@scienceupfirst.bsky.social) May 30, 2025 at 3:50 PM

  • SIFT: 90s Rap Edition

    Do you know the difference between vertical and lateral reading? Fact-checkers use lateral reading because it is faster, more efficient, and less biased than vertical reading.

    The SIFT method involves:
    S, stopping
    I, Investigating the source
    F, Finding better coverage and 
    T, Tracing the information. 

    We’ll summarize each point for you so you know how to SIFT.

    Did you know about this fact-checking method? Let us know and don’t hesitate to share this video with your loved ones!

    Initial beat produced by Shayzex Beats and remixed by us.

    We also did a post on SIFT that gets a little deeper into the process.

    Share our original Bluesky Post!

    Fact-checkers use lateral reading because it is faster, more efficient, and less biased than vertical reading. It’s called the SIFT method. 👉 scienceupfirst.com/misinformati… Questions about the SIFT method? Ask us in the comments! #ScienceUpFirst

    — ScienceUpFirst (@scienceupfirst.bsky.social) May 28, 2025 at 10:51 AM

  • “They need to speak a language everyone can understand”: Accessibility of COVID-19 vaccine information for Canadian adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities

    Survey research shows Canadians with intellectual and developmental disabilities can struggle finding and understanding information about vaccines. Struggles are also evident in accessing vaccines, such as booking appointments. Information overload and inconsistent messaging present significant issues. Efforts can be made to strengthen trust in sources, clarity of information, and community engagement (i.e. with highly accessible information).

  • Myth Busting Starter Pack

    We might be a little late to the trend, but this one was too good to pass up! 

    Introducing: ScienceUpFirst’s Myth Buster Starter Pack!

    Here are four essential accessories for anyone aspiring to become a Myth Busting champion. 

    Listening & Empathy essentials: First, a great myth buster listens closely, opens respectful dialogue, and always approaches others with empathy — even when they don’t share their views. 💬🩵👂 

    A reminder to pause before sharing: A mindful myth buster also knows that one of the easiest ways to stop misinformation is to pause and ask: “Is this true?” before sharing information online. 🛑 

    Red flag spotter: Myth busters are also really good at spotting the various misinformers’ tactics and misleading reasoning that are often used to spread misinformation. 🔍🚩

    Finally, myth busters always read past the headlines, check the credibility of their sources, and consult more than one to get the full picture. 📚That’s why we’ve added multiple trusted sources!

    Sound like you? Then welcome to the squad!

    Share our original Bluesky Post!

    We may be late to the trend, but it was too much fun 😅 Here's our myth-buster's starter pack! Featuring many exciting accessories that you can read more about here 👉 scienceupfirst.com/misinformati… Do you see yourself in our set? Welcome to the team! #ScienceUpFirst

    [image or embed]

    — ScienceUpFirst (@scienceupfirst.bsky.social) May 2, 2025 at 10:38 AM

  • The development of media truth discernment and fake news detection is related to the development of reasoning during adolescence

    Increasing logical and reasoning capacity among youth will lead to better detection of fake and inaccurate news content over one’s lifetime. 

    Research focused on adolescents assessed truth discernment and the “illusory truth” effect, an effect which highlights how that increased exposures to fake information creates heightened impressions of accuracy.

    Key findings include further evidence of the illusory truth effect and that increased reasoning abilities strengthens the ability to discern truth in media.

  • Middle Ground Fallacy

    I say, bananas are yellow. You say, bananas are red. Can’t we compromise and just call them orange?

    Here’s another example, let’s say two people argue about eating raw chicken. One says it can contain harmful bacteria and must be fully cooked. The other says it’s totally fine to eat raw. To settle the debate, they compromise by only cooking the chicken partially, so it’s still a little pink inside.

    That’s the middle ground fallacy in action, and a salmonella special waiting to happen (1,2). Yikes!

    Also called appeal to moderation, golden mean fallacy, or gray fallacy, this reasoning suggests that the middle point between two opposing views is automatically the most accurate (3,4,5,6). But truth isn’t decided by averaging opinions. If one of those extremes is clearly false, then the compromise isn’t a fair solution – it’s a distortion of the truth (3,7).

    This fallacy is sneaky because it “feels” fair (8). But it’s misleading (2,4,5,7,8):

    • It gives both arguments the same weight, even when only one is supported by science (read more about the false balance bias – 9). Raw chicken can carry harmful bacteria like Salmonella and Campylobacter, and the only way to kill it is by cooking the meat thoroughly.
    • It assumes that the middle ground is always the best answer – but “a little pink” is still unsafe.
    • It ignores the possibility that other, better solutions might exist.
    • It can encourage people to present radical or false claims, hoping others will settle on a “reasonable” middle, which would still include misinformation.

    Sometimes, finding a compromise is helpful. But when it comes to facts, “meeting in the middle” isn’t always the best – or the most accurate – solution (2,4,5,7,8).

    To avoid falling for it (6):

    • Ask: Is there evidence for both sides?
    • Evaluate each claim on its own, not just where it sits on a spectrum.
    • Remember: half-truths can still be harmful.

    Truth isn’t always found halfway between two opinions. Sometimes, it’s firmly on one side.

    Sources
    1. Edzard Ernst: The “middle ground” fallacy | The BMJ | July 2012
    2. Poultry safety | Government of Canada | February 2019
    3. Middle ground | Your logical fallacy is
    4. Middle Ground – Definition & Examples | Logical Fallacies
    5. Argument to Moderation | Logically Fallacious
    6. What is The Middle Ground Fallacy? | Critical Thinking Basics – Psychology Corner
    7. The Problem with the Middle Ground | by Diana Van Dyke | Medium | March 2023
    8. Middle Ground – Bad Arguments | Wiley Online Library | May 2018
    9. False Balance Bias | ScienceUpFirst | September 2023

    Share our original Bluesky post!

    The truth isn't always found halfway between two opinions. Sometimes it's firmly on one side. Learn more about Middle Ground Fallacy here. 👉 scienceupfirst.com/misinformati… #ScienceUpFirst

    [image or embed]

    — ScienceUpFirst (@scienceupfirst.bsky.social) April 17, 2025 at 4:19 PM

  • Canadian Medical Association 2025 health and media annual tracking survey. 2nd edition

    Survey of the Canadian population finds high presence of, and exposures to, misinformation online. More than 33% of Canadians report having avoided at least one effective treatment because of inaccurate information. Approximately 1 in 4 Canadians believe in the chemtrails conspiracy, that the mercury preservative in vaccines (thimerosal) could cause autism, and that 5G causes cancer. 

  • The Little Guide to Spotting Bots

    Social Media Bots can be designed for different purposes (2,11,19): 

    • Click/Like Farming: Bots boost an account’s popularity by generating fake likes or reposts.
    • Hashtag Highjacking: Bots use popular hashtags to spread spam or malicious content.
    • Repost Storm: A lead bot shares content, triggering a coordinated reposting attack by a bot network.
    • Trend Jacking: Bots exploit trending topics to spread their message or target an audience.
    • Astroturfing: Bots can throw their weight behind different issues to artificially inflate the perception of support.

    There are detection tools online that can help you identify X bot accounts (e.g. Bot-o-Meter, Twitter Audit, Bot Sentinel) (18).

    If you think you have found a bot, report it and block it (20). By reporting bot accounts and removing them from your followers list, you can limit the spread of misinformation, but also potentially boost your account as engagement on your posts will now be more genuine (16). 

    Have you spotted bots in the wild? How did you know they were bot accounts? Let us know!

    Sources
    1. BotSpot: Twelve Ways to Spot a Bot | Digital Forensic Research Lab | August 2017
    2. Social Media Bots Overview | Homeland Security | May 2018
    3. Twitter Bots & Climate Disinformation | Scientific American | January 2021
    4. Social media, fake news, and polarization | Science Direct
    5. New Strategy to Detect Social Bots | Stonybrook University | November 2021
    6. Inside a Facebook Bot Farm | Comparitech | March 2022
    7. Nearly 48 million Twitter accounts could be bots | CNBC | March 2017
    8. Huge networks of fake accounts found on Twitter | BBC News | January 2017
    9. Battle of the Botnets | Digital Forensic Research Lab | July 2017
    10. Bots and Computational Propaganda | Cambridge University | August 2020
    11. Social Media Bots Infographic Set |The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) 
    12. Bots tried to influence the U.S. election | science.org | September 2017
    13. ‘Bots’ boost Russian backlash against Olympic ban | Reuters | December 2017
    14. Spotting Bots | TRADOC
    15. What Is ‘Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior’? | snopes.com | September 2021
    16. Snopes Tips: How to Spot Social Media Bots | snopes.com | July 2022
    17. How to spot fake social media accounts, bots and trolls dw.com |July 2022
    18. Media Literacy & Misinformation | Monmouth University
    19. Instagram Spam Bots | FraudBlocker.com 
    20. The Ultimate Guide to Spotting and Fighting Bots on Social Media | BitDefender.com | July 2023

    Share our original Bluesky Post!

    Bots are everywhere. While some are useful, others manipulate trends, spread misinformation, and distort public opinion. How can you spot them? What can you do? Learn more 👉 scienceupfirst.com/misinformati… #ScienceUpFirst

    [image or embed]

    — ScienceUpFirst (@scienceupfirst.bsky.social) April 4, 2025 at 10:26 AM

  • Do you have depression? A summative content analysis of mental health-related content on TikTok

    Analysis on the top 1000 TikTok videos with the hashtag #mentalhealth finds misleading content in 33.0% of videos containing advice or information. Videos with misleading content were viewed, liked, commented on, and shared more, on average, than videos with non-misleading content. 

  • Welcome To Your Wellness Session

    We’re so excited about the season finale of Severance that we wanted to see what it would look like if our “innies” went through a wellness session.

    Are you watching Severance? Or did this video make you say, “huh?!” Let us know!

    Share our original Bluesky post!

    We’re so excited about the season finale of Severance that we wanted to see what it would look like if our “innies” went through a wellness session. Are you watching Severance? Or did this video make you say, "huh?!" #ScienceUpFirst #LaSciencedAbord #TogetherAgainstMisinformation

    [image or embed]

    — ScienceUpFirst (@scienceupfirst.bsky.social) March 21, 2025 at 9:15 AM

  • The algorithmic knowledge gap within and between countries: Implications for combatting misinformation

    Algorithmic knowledge varies across countries with Americans reported to have the greatest knowledge followed by respondents from the UK, Mexico, and South Korea. Having increased algorithmic knowledge can lead to increased misinformation combatting activities on social media.

  • Using artificial intelligence (AI) to assess the prevalence of false or misleading health-related claims

    Artificial intelligence (AI) text analysis tools were able to comprehensively and accurately assess misleading health claims on complimentary and natural health websites in the UK. These tools therefore have the potential to help in regulatory efforts addressing the commercialization of pseudoscientific therapies.

  • Who U.S. Adults Follow on TikTok

    46% of Americans on TikTok follow mid-tier influencers & content creators, and only 0.4% follow journalists, pundits, and media outlets. Nearly 60% follow accounts that post about pop culture and entertainment, and 36% follow accounts that post about stories, vlogs and personal updates. Only 10% follow accounts that post about politics, and 5% that post about news.

  • Pulse on TikTok (September 2024)

    Americans using TikTok say they experience exposures to inaccurate or misleading information, and that the platform’s algorithm “almost exclusively” presents content that aligns with their views on political and social issues.